4K crop: the 1dx mk ii has a 4k crop factor of 1.3x, whereas the 5D mark iv has a 4k crop factor of 1.74x or something C-Log: the 5D mark iv can be upgraded to include C-Log as an option, which isn't in the cards at this point for the 1DX mark ii. Here, in my view, are the video differences: Neither will be as crisp as a C-series cine camera, but they will be full frame. To my eye, the 1080p footage looks the same, they have equal autofocus capabilities, and they both have high frame rates. That said, he got it before the 5d mark iv came out. There are some very talented people who swear by the 1DX mark ii for video, most famously Parker Wahlbeck: My view from the footage I've seen is that the IQ between the two cameras is basically the same, as was the case with the 6D and the 5D mk iii, which I intercut all the time. Thanks for making the world a better place for uh, yourself. Waddizzle if you haven't used either camera for video and can't speak to the question (which is a valid one), I think your work is done here. I made an account just to help out xeveserpere as a fellow human being using these forums for the right reasons (asking for opinions based on experience or technical knowledge in order to weigh purchase options).
0 kommentar(er)
